Gibson & Couric Butchered Sarah Palin Interviews

Dear Beloved,

Just would like to give everyone a "heads up" with regard to the 2 infamous interviews done by Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric. They did a butchering job on Sarah Palin. Kindly read the following article I read two days ago, put out by http://www.newsmax.com/ It highlights some of the willful deception that newscasters, Gibson & Couric, dish out to their audience. Talk about shady and underhanded reporting, actually it's more like what's done in communist nations. I, personally, lived and worked in a communist nation for wellover a decade. While there, an elderly man, living in such an environment his entire life, told me, "the only news you can believe in our newspapers and television is...the date." Has American journalism become so base that lies and trickery are now acceptable practices?

Well friends, here's the revealing article:
______________________________________________________________________________________
CBS, ABC Distort Sarah Palin Interview
It is a tale of two con jobs.

As outlined in my previous LCR, ABC’s Charles Gibson interview of Sarah Palin was questionably edited. Now CBS has followed suit with the Katie Couric interview of the GOP vice presidential candidate.

A pattern of distortion has emerged. Both ABC and CBS cut answers by Palin; answers that would have indicated a more nuanced approach to foreign policy when it comes to the issue of multilateral diplomacy.

In the Couric interview, Palin answered a question that dealt with what the U.S. should do to convince Pakistan to take a harder line against terrorists.

“At a time when new leadership comes in, that is the opportunity to forge better, tighter, more productive relationships and that’s what we’ll take advantage of with new leadership in the U.S. and in Pakistan. And I’m sure that President Zardari, too, will agree with us as we commit to the support that Pakistan needs, that other nations in the region need, in order to win this war on terrorism,” Palin responded.
This question and answer were edited out. Could it be that Palin’s response did not serve CBS’s desired post-interview spin?

When Couric inquired about the implementation of democracy in other parts of the world, Palin answered, “Well, one is that America cannot be counted on to do this solely, to be the savior of every other nation, but we need friends and we need allies and we need this nation-building effort and we need to forge new alliances, and that is what a new election will provide opportunity to do.”
This response, too, was withheld from the public.

Could it be once again that CBS did not find the response to be consistent with the hawkish image of Palin that mainstream media are trying to cloak her with?

Similarly, Couric asked about instances when a democracy does not produce the desired outcome, such as in the election of Hamas.
“Especially in that region, though, we have got to protect those and support those who do seek democracy and do seek protections for the people who live there. And you know, we’re seeing today, in the last couple of days here in New York, a speaker, a president of Iran, Ahmadinejad, who would come on our soil and express such disdain for one of our closest allies and friends—Israel—and we’re hearing the evil that he speaks . . .
"If hearing him doesn’t allow Americans to commit more solidly to protecting the friends and allies that we need, especially there in the Mideast, then nothing will,” Palin responded.
“If Americans are not waking up to understand what it is that he represents, then nothing is going to wake us up and we will be lulled into some kind of false sense of security that perhaps Americans were a part of before 9/11,” she added.
Again CBS editors snipped away.

ABC News cut similar content from the Gibson interview.
Intelligent, thoughtful, reasoned responses edited out? Beyond shameful, this represents the utter corruption of the Fourth Estate.
The New Media thankfully ride to the rescue.
____________________________________________________________________________________

As someone with training in journalism, I know full well that, by and large, the media is extremely biased to the left. If you have any doubt of this at all, just read Bernard Goldberg's book, which was a #1 New York Times Best Seller. I have. By the way, he, himself, is not a conservative, but a liberal with journalistic conscience (my term, not his). Here's an excerpt about the book:

In 1996, veteran CBS News reporter and producer Bernie Goldberg committed the unpardonable sin of publicly mentioning the issue of liberal bias in the media. For that he became persona non grata at CBS. Goldberg tells how friends and colleagues turned on him, from junior CBS reporters all the way to Dan Rather. But much more than that, he exposes a bias so uniform and overwhelming that it permeates every news story we hear and read- and so entrenched and deep rooted that the networks themselves don't even recognize it.

Many of you heard me say, repeatedly since March, that I was not too thrilled with any of the candidates running for office. I also said at that time that "who knows, if God would sovereignly raise up someone presently not running or a person whom we don't even know about and put them in position." Who else possibly fits that bill but Sarah Palin?

Also, tell me honestly, have you ever heard of anyone running as a VP to receive such overt hostility and obvious disdain by interviewing newscasters, in the history of politics? (Couric, in my view, won the "most rude and obnoxious" category, displaying not even a hint of professionalism or common courtesy. She should definitely lose her position as a chief anchor. No wonder her channel is lowest in ratings among the competition. CBS' evening news broadcast is bound to sink even lower in ratings, as long as they have her at the helm.)

Joe Biden ran for political office, shortly after losing his wife and son to a horrific car accident, yet he continued in politics and held an office where he had to travel out of state daily. Sarah has a loving, willing husband who cares for his children and her office and residence while in office will be in close proximity of each other. By the way, where are all the feminists that champion women's right these days??? You know, their the ones who cry "discrimination" and "sexism" whenever they feel a woman's rights have been violated or ignored. They seem mighty silent now, don't you think? Reason being is that they are not seriously interested in the rights of all women, only women who ascribe to their brand of ideology and ways. They appear absolutely silent, with regard to the dispicable condescending approach leading newscasters took when interviewing Sarah Palin. Feminists' silence reveals what a bunch of biased hypocrites they truly are. Not only is Sarah Palin a woman, she is a female governor of an American state. Yet there is no cry of "foul" being uttered from the previous loud and blatantly "in your face" feminist crowd. Why do you suppose that is? Here is the difficult truth of that answer: Liberal feminists who don't like traditional family values and despise men, hate Sarah Palin because she promotes life and they promote death. She promotes light and they promote darkness. She stands for right and they stand for wrong. They promote sodomy and lesbianism while she promotes healthy sexuality and marriage as God designed, between a monogamous man and woman. They can't stand her because she and her husband walk the talk and they don't. They absolutely cringe when they see her Downs Syndrome baby boy alive and thriving because they have murdered their healthy babies, far more their special needs unborn babies.

Truth is not always easy to swallow, but it remains truth, nonetheless.

When viewing tonight's debate between Palin and Biden, pray for God's purposes to be fulfilled and that fairness will rule over deceipt and bias.